Search Results

The results of your search have been divided into the following tabbed sections. To see search results from any of these areas of The Chicago Manual of Style Online, click on the appropriate tab.
Results 1 - 10 of 128 for discourse.
Sort by date / Sort by relevance

[Forum] RE: Punctuation for thoughts
I wouldn't use italics. I'd treat unspoken discourse the same as any other discourse. See [url=http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch13/ch13_sec041.html]CMOS 13.41: Unspoken discourse[/url].

[Forum] RE: Internal Dialogue Tense
CMOS says that unspoken discourse can be either in quotation marks or not. See [url=http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch13/ch13_sec041.html]13.41: Unspoken discourse[/url]. That said, I feel it's more of a style choice than anything else. In a book that contains a lot of unspoken discourse, I p

[Forum] RE: Punctuation and italics
My question is related, but slightly different. One person touched on it, but here goes. I am editing and proofing my wife's books (fiction). Some say that's a bad idea in itself, but it works for her--and I'm cheap but rather good. At any rate, we have been italicizing internal discourse. I decided

[Forum] RE: "When she said" versus "When we say"
With spoken discourse, I generally like a comma before "say." When it's internal discourse, I could go either direction. Sometimes it just depends on how it's set up: I thought, "How am I going to get out of this one?" But I've also seen: I thought [i]How am I going to get out of this one?[

[Forum] RE: Punctuation for typed dialogue
You might find [url=https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/book/ed17/part2/ch13/psec039.html]13.39: Direct discourse[/url] helpful.   I would caution against the use of italics for direct discourse. [i]You might wish to reserve italics for emphasis, even within direct discourse.[/i] I am respond

[Forum] RE: Time
Numbers in text are different from discourse, RG. Take a look here: [url=http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch13/ch13_sec042.html]13.42: Numerals in direct discourse[/url].

[Forum] RE: New sentence within a quote
This is unspoken discourse, not actual dialogue. Therefore, no cap is needed. See [url=http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch13/ch13_sec041.html]CMOS 13.41: Unspoken discourse[/url].

[Forum] RE: Fictional Discourse
I don't think so. See 13.42 [url=http://http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch13/ch13_sec042.html]Numerals in Direct Discourse[/url]

[Forum] RE: Punctuation of embedded thoughts
CMOS uses quotation marks or no special treatment at all. Unspoken discourse (aka thoughts) should be capped the same as spoken discourse. See [url=http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/16/ch13/ch13_sec041.html]CMOS 13.41[/url].

[Forum] RE: Punctuation of embedded thoughts
I've seen italics used in novels too, but mostly for thoughts of the protagonist. If you were to use italics, I would treat the unspoken discourse the same as I would spoken discourse -- a comma after "thinks" and the first word capped, as in the following: Milt thinks, [i]So she is worried. [/i]

 Next 10